GenesisRaman Femtosecond Laser Ablation - Raman Spectroscopy Fusion System
Developed independently by Shanghai Chemlab Instrument Co., Ltd., the GenesisRaman system represents the first domestically produced high-end research instrument integrating matrix-array femtosecond laser ablation, confocal Raman spectroscopy, and heating–freezing stage. The system is equipped with a high-energy femtosecond laser, high-definition microscopy, high-spectral-resolution Raman detector, Z-axis dynamic zoom control system, cryogenic ablation module, and nanometer-precision 3D translation stage. It delivers reliable, efficient, and accurate molecular structural and chemical compositional analysis of fluid inclusions for research on ore-forming fluid sources, petroleum reservoir formation, deep geological processes, and metallogenic mechanisms.
Key advances over conventional LA-ICP-MS for fluid inclusion analysis:
1. Difficulty in inclusion observation?
→ Clear visualization of inclusions <10 μm

Figure 1: Clear observation of sub-10 μm inclusions
2. Challenges with 193 nm nanosecond laser ablation?
→ Efficient ablation of host minerals including quartz and fluorite

Figure 2: Efficient ablation of quartz-hosted fluid inclusions
3. Depth-of-field limitations with conventional femtosecond systems? Liquid splashing during fluid inclusion ablation compromising signal acquisition?
→ Z-axis dynamic zoom combined with cryogenic ablation technology

Figure 3: Stable ablation of quartz-hosted fluid inclusions using Z-axis dynamic zoom and cryogenic ablation
4. Sample transfer, repositioning errors, and calibration difficulties between separate Raman, microthermometry, and laser ablation instruments?
→ Unified platform control and data integration

Figure 4: Laser ablation, Raman spectroscopy, and heating–freezing stage integrated within a single control and analysis software platform, eliminating multi-instrument calibration and secondary positioning
5. Complex operation, low data accuracy, and prolonged experimental cycles?
→ High data accuracy and analytical efficiency

Figure 5: Comparison of data accuracy between conventional LA-ICP-MS fluid inclusion analysis (Jiang et al., 2024) and Chemlab LA-ICP-MS fluid inclusion analysis